Here's a variation of a scenario I'm hearing a few times a week.
A married couple with kids wants to buy a larger home. The gain on their current home is $600,000 (at current market value less expenses). They currently qualify for the $500,000 exclusion as they have owned and lived in this house for well over 2 years and meet all of the other IRS requirements.
Question 1: In this market, should they sell or rent their current home?
Question 2: When they do sell will they have a $100,000 taxable gain? ($600,000 actual gain less $500,000 exclusion)
Answer 1: Both are options. So long as they sell their home within three years of moving to their new home, and continue to meet the other requirements, they will still be able to exclude $500,000 of gain.
The problem is that three years is not considered "long term" when it comes to the market. The market could conceivably be in worse shape, and then the homeowners are pressured to sell their home in whatever the current market is in order to keep their exclusion.
However, when this is gain in excess of the exclusion amount (as there is in this case), it may make sense to convert the property into investment property for two years. See Answer 2.
Answer 2:
By combining the benefits of IRS Section 121 and 1031, a homeowner can achieve the most of both worlds. They can conceivably exclude the $500,000 and defer the remaining gain into a new investment property.
Here's an example from Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2005-7 with a Single Taxpayer (who's exclusion amount is only $250,000 instead of the married exclusion of $500,000
(Warning: It's complicated stuff, but the idea is to show you that there are strategies that can save you a ton of money and that's why it's so very important to contact your tax advisor BEFORE selling any property!)
Single Taxpayer A buys a house for $210,000 that A uses as A's principal residence from 2000 to 2004. From 2004 until 2006, A rents the house to tenants and claims depreciation deductions of $20,000. In 2006, A exchanges the house for $10,000 of cash and a townhouse with a fair market value of $460,000 that A intends to rent to tenants. A realizes gain of $280,000 on the exchange.
A's exchange of a principal residence that A rents for less than 3 years for a townhouse intended for rental and cash satisfies the requirements of both §§ 121 and 1031. Section 121 does not require the property to be the taxpayer's principal residence on the sale or exchange date. Because A owns and uses the house as A's principal residence for at least 2 years during the 5-year period prior to the exchange, A may exclude gain under § 121. Because the house is investment property at the time of the exchange, A may defer gain under § 1031.
A applies § 121 to exclude $250,000 of the $280,000 gain before applying the nonrecognition rules of § 1031. A may defer the remaining gain of $30,000, including the $20,000 gain attributable to depreciation, under § 1031. Although A receives $10,000 of cash (boot) in the exchange, A is not required to recognize gain because the boot is taken into account for purposes of § 1031(b) only to the extent the boot exceeds the amount of excluded gain.
These results are illustrated as follows.
| Amount realized |
| $470,000 |
|
| Less: | Adjusted basis | $190,000 |
|
|
| Realized gain | $280,000 |
|
| Less: | Gain excluded under § 121 | $250,000 |
|
|
| Gain to be deferred | $30,000 |
|
Again, these are just to show you one of the countless strategies that can be applied to your situation. Consult your tax advisor and see applicable IRS Code Sections and Revenue Procedures for more information.
I hope you have a great day!
Nancy Moeller, CPA, REALTOR
714 276-7006
